925-432-7447
DUI basicsChoosing a DUI AttorneyStages of a DUI CaseContact UsResources
DUI OverviewRequest a HearingDUI Questionsfield sobriety testsBreath & Blood testsPenaltiesAlternatives to custodyDUI boating DMV Hearing

Administrative Per Se (DUI Hearing) Background

YOU HAVE 10 DAYS FROM THE DATE
YOU ARE ARRESTED FOR A DUI
TO CONTACT THE DMV AND REQUEST
AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
REGARDING YOUR LICENSE.


In 1990, California became the 28th state to implement an immediate driver license suspension law for alcohol-impaired drivers, also referred to as an “Administrative Per Se (APS)” or “on-the-spot” license suspension law. The California APS law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to suspend or revoke the driving privilege of persons who are arrested for driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08% or more, or who refuse a chemical test upon arrest. In January 1994, California implemented a companion driver license suspension law, known as the “zero tolerance law,” which requires DMV to suspend for one year any driver under age 21 with a BAC of .01% or more as measured by a preliminary alcohol screening test, or who refuses or fails to complete the test. These administrative actions are independent of any criminal penalties imposed in court for conviction of the driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offense. Upon arrest, or detention (as applicable in the .01% APS law), the driver’s license is immediately confiscated and an order of suspension or revocation served.

For either law, due process is allowed by the issuance of a 30-day temporary license intended to provide the driver with sufficient time to challenge the suspension through DMV administrative review. The time allowed to challenge the suspension was reduced from 45 days on July 1, 1993. As of January 1, 1993, offenders who are dismissed for insufficient evidence or are never charged by the court may request an APS dismissal hearing to consider setting aside the associated APS action. Under the .08% APS law, when a driver submits to and “fails” a BAC test and has no prior DUI convictions or APS actions (within 7 years prior to September 20, 2005 and within 10 years thereafter), a 4-month license suspension is imposed. Following 30 days of “hard” suspension, and providing they first demonstrate proof of insurance, show proof of enrollment in an approved alcohol treatment program, and pay all penalty fees, the law provided for such drivers to obtain either a 90-day restricted license to drive to and from an alcohol treatment program (repealed September 20, 2005), or (as of January 1, 1995) a 5-month restricted license which also allows driving to, from, and during the course of employment. A 1-year suspension is imposed on drivers having one or more prior DUI convictions or APS actions within 7 years prior to September 20, 2005 and within 10 years thereafter, with no provision for a restricted license.

Under this law, for offenders refusing a BAC test, a 1-year license suspension is imposed for a first offense, a 2-year revocation is imposed for a second offender refusal, and a 3-year revocation is imposed for a third-or-subsequent offender refusal (within 7 years prior to September 20, 2005 and within 10 years thereafter). There are no provisions for issuance of a restricted license following a BAC test refusal.

The .01% BAC law requires a 1-year suspension and provides for a hardship restriction only if a BAC test was completed and the driver can demonstrate a critical need to drive.

As of September 20, 2005 commercial drivers arrested in a noncommercial vehicle and having no prior DUI convictions or APS actions (within 7 years prior to September 20, 2005 and within 10 years thereafter) are handled no differently than other first offenders and are no longer granted an automatic restriction to drive to, from, and during the course of employment following a 30-day “hard” suspension as they originally were. (A noncommercial vehicle is one not requiring a commercial driver license, or heavy-vehicle operator’s license, to drive.)



What Happens at the DMV DUI/DWI Administrative Per Se Hearing

A DMV Administrative Per Se Hearing is an informal proceeding that occurs in-person or can occur over the telephone. The hearing officer conducts the hearing acting as both the judge and prosecutor. This is a conflict that is allowed to exist under current law and requires a truly knowledgeable and savvy attorney to handle.

Our office generally conducts the DMV hearings in person as opposed to telephone hearings. We feel this is an important service to provide our clients and we are convinced based on our experience and success that it is important to conduct the hearings in person.

The hearing occurs at a DMV Driver’s safety office in a plain room with generally a simple table and chairs, tape recorder and telephone. The hearing officer and the attorney are present. The hearing officer will make a decision on whether to require the law enforcement officer who arrested you for DUI to appear. The DMV is not required to bring in the officer and can rely entirely on the police report.

The attorney can compel the law enforcement officer’s appearance if it is in the interest of the client to have the law enforcement officer present. The attorney can compel other witnesses to appear and testify if it is in the client’s interest, including expert witnesses to address issues such as the validity of the chemical test.

The issues to be decided at the DMV hearing are:
When a chemical test was taken:

1. Did the officer have reasonable cause to believe that the accused was driving a motor vehicle in violation of the drunk driving laws (CVC 23152 or 23153)
2. Was the accused lawfully arrested
3. Was the accused driving a motor vehicle when she or he had .08 or more, by weight,
of alcohol in their blood

When no chemical test is taken

1. Did the officer have reasonable cause to believe that the accused was driving a motor vehicle in violation of the drunk driving laws (CVC 23152 or CVC 23153)
2. Was the accused lawfully arrested
3. Was the accused told that their driving privilege would be suspended for one year, or revoked for two or three years, if they refused to submit to, or failed to complete, a chemical test
4. Did the accused refuse to submit to, or fail to complete, a chemical test after being requested to do so by a peace officer?

Our office has many winning strategies that address each of the issues raised at an Administrative Per Se hearing. We have been very successful in formulating different winning strategies for our clients.

To request a hearing, you MUST contact a Driver Safety Office. Click here for a list.





 
 

DUI Basics | Choosing a DUI Attorney | Stages of a DUI Case | The Attorneys | Contact | Resources
Home | © 2008 Johnson & Johnson. All rights reserved.